"The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations
is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and
national independence and submergence into an all powerful,
one world government."
by:
Rear Admiral Chester Ward
Rear Admiral US Navy (retired), CFR member for 16 years, Judge Advocate General of the Navy 1956-60
Rating:
Categories:
 
Bookmark and Share  
Reader comments about this quote:
This is absolutely true. Every American should learn about the Council on Foreign Relations and judge for themselves their allegiance, their agenda, and their power. They are absolutely a treasonous organization, and are succeeding in their plans to turn America into a socialist state subservient to the 'New World Order'. It is not a conspiracy -- it is being performed right before our very eyes with the support of our 'elected' representatives (of course, the CFR decided who the choices would be in the first place).
 -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 3
  •  
    Knowledge Is Power! If you want to know more about what "They" don't want you to know, purchase the book: "Behold A Pale Horse" by William Milton Cooper BUT Buy It With Cash to avoid a paper trail.
     -- Anonymous, Somewhere,USA.     
  • 3
  •  
    We must vote to stop our representatives from giving the U.N. our sovereignty, and prevent them from turning us into a Socialist country, even though our own elected officials call us unpatriotic.
     -- Joel, Rochester, MI     
  • 1
  •  
     -- Vinny, Florida State      
    Apparently this New World Order would have an American Republican president and administration as the 'president' of the world. How do I know this? Here's pres. GW Bush: "The world is more peaceful and more free under my leadership." GW Bush on 10/28/03
     -- A.Jurgensen, Stuart, FL     
  •  
    Of course its true !!!!. This conspiracy goes back at least to the Napoleonic Wars. Following that little fracas (fully organized by a major banking group) the first attempt at a one world government was made by The Congress of Vienna (Metternich)...Russia would not have anything to do with it...(hum ...what to do...better get rid of the pesky czar) 1917 banking interests underwrite the soviet revolution of 1917....that way the world is put on a permanent war footing and the banks get ever richer while ordinary citizens become ever poorer...All the sovereign countries of the world are in debt....who to...the banks...want to see where the crooks are...follow the money. Woodrow Wilson would not have anything to do with the League of Nations ...what a good guy ! How to fix that....GIVE the land to the UN for free...! Good one ! That way the USA cannot refuse the poison chalice. There are powerful interests in the USA who are committing treason against that great country.... First priority...declare PEACE...anyone who wants to continually place the USA as the "policeman of the world" is an enemy of the Comman Man. Second priority....get OUT of the UN...Its sole purpose is to drive the USA to bankruptcy. Good Luck
     -- mark, gold coast...Australia     
  • 2
  •  
    I strongly recommend reading "Creature from Jekyll Island", by G. Edward Griffin, to even better understand the depth of the extant conspiracy to establish a one-world (New World) order. This book reveals from whence, and why, US dollars are NOT controlled by the US government. Instead, we the people suffer in order to enrich those who plan to remain aloof and elite from the "useful idiots" (CFR jargon for we the people). We in fact are funding our own demise by allowing "The Fed" to control our US money. You might also want to check out www.thenewamerican.com.
     -- Don Crosson, Harrah, OK     
  • 1
  •  
    What garbage. Loook back at history and you can see. There are always people who can find cospiracy. Usually in their imagination.
     -- altacaka, Melrose NY     
  • 2
  •  
    What in the heck are all of you folks talking about? The Council On Foreign Relations was started by a group of influential, scholarly and knowledgeable people (they do exist you know and always will) at the end of the WWI. (Thank God for influential, scholarly and knowledgeable people otherwise all of us would be running things, God help us!) Its' stated purpose was to inform public opinion on foreign affairs. Some of its' members were John Foster Dulles (later to be Secretary of State) Averell Harriman (later to be Sec of State) Herbert Hoover (ever heard of him). If all want to believe in conspiracy yes there is conspiracy behind every group, lobbyist and even voter to get his agenda and his way of thinking into the top levels of real policy makers. The Council On Foreign Relations is a top notch organization on this subject and any one can join. Archer what are you smoking today?
     -- Bruce, 'Bama     
  • 1
  •  
    You don't get to be a Rear Admiral in the US Navy by being naive, a liar, or inexperienced. Ward's opinion may be somewhat jaded, or not, but, being a CFR 16yr member would probably qualify the Admiral to make clear the intent and fact (debunking the theory) of conspiracy. If you don't like the word conspiracy, then there are just a bunch of folks with a plan to work, and are working that plan for the "... disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government." And, as for Bruce's politicos examples, they simply prove the Admiral's point.
     -- Mike, Norwalk     
  • 2
  •  
    Nixon (God bless him) said, "Never negotiate in fear but never fear to negotiate." It seemeth to me that some folks trust not the government of these states to ever talk to, let alone negotiate with anyone, anywhere, at any time. Now that is naive and chikens**t.
     -- Bruce, 'Bama     
  •  
    Bruce, you have not even scratched the surface. Dig a little deeper and stop being an apologist for global fascism. Without a clear understanding of how fiat currencies kill a sovereign nation, few can comprehend the absolute tyranny of groups like the CFR, Trilateralists, the UN, and the bankers that control them all. CFR decides who the presidential candidates will be -- that is why it doesn't matter if it would have been Kerry or Bush -- they are in the same fraternity and both further their part of the new world order boot on our faces. Ignorance is bliss.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
  •  
    I am so heartend E to hear you refer to our nation as soverign (I think you mean USA). Between you and Mike I am not sure who most disclaims that the USA has any soverignity at all, always demurring in favor of the states. As far as NEW WORLD ORDER and the fear it casts into the psyche of the great unwashed it is a totally fraudulent fear born of lack of education. Let me educate you. There has always been a world order and many new world orders. We had the Greeks, then the Roman New World Order, the medieval new world order, Napoleon set up his European new world order, etcetera, their was a world order known loosely as the Vitorian Age (which my the way brought a long period of peace and prosperity, invention the industrial age etc.), Hitler tried to set up a new world order. The only thing about the New World Order, is that it is the newest of many. Has your wife ever sat you down and said "we need to talk, some things have to change around here" so we have a new order of things. The knee jerkers need to get a lfe.
     -- Bruce, 'Bama     
  • 3
  •  
    Bruce: The State (Republic) is a sovereign representative of the individual sovereign. The States united or The United States is sovereign as it is the sovereign representative of the States. The United States was given a very limited scope of action. By way of example: religion, prayer, etc. was specifically a State issue. The Constitution directly addressed the issue. Even if you take the separation of church and state out of context from Jefferson's letter, as did the Supreme Court, It still says the FEDERAL government must remain moot on the subject. The Supreme Court's legislating an Atheist's perspective, by way of public expression/non-expression, committed an illegal atrocity. I believe the U.S. government is essential, moral, a lawful sovereign, and a blessing as it was originally intended. Until the U.S. is corrected (first by representing the States again and acting within Constitutional bounds; and then ...), it is absurd to pile on more tyranny through corrupt councils and world bodies.
     -- Mike, Norwalk     
  • 2
  •  
    Bruce, I don't get it, why do you continue to defend the corruption of the American republic(s) with examples of tyranny? You make no argument other than, 'hey, there have always been tyrants promoting their version of a new world order so get a life' -- yes, there have -- and it isn't over, and the American people have been duped and well indoctrinated into believing that 'all is well'. All is not well, and the tyrants make more inroads every day because of apologists unconscious of their own collusion with tyranny. Seriously, Bruce, how much further towards fascism do you think we should go? Obviously Liberty is something you believe in -- why hold such collectivist (and ultimately totalitarian) views? Are the American people any better prepared than the German people or the Russian people were when their countries were taken over? It can't happen here? You better God damn believe it can!
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 1
  •  
    There is a new world order every time there is a new President. Reagan created a new world order when he called the Soviet Union an evil empire. Bush the first used the term new world order in a speech and the unlearned jumped on it as if it were some SciFi fascist/socialist all those words you use E. It don't mean any of that crazy stuff. An American governor is a member of a club of 50. When an American politician becomes President his aim in Foreign Relations is to bring his view point to the International Club of whatever the number of countries is 200 or so. It is a new world order. "World order" is no different that city order, state order etcetera. There is nothing new about "new world order" except that the current "new world order" is the newest one. I never said that all promoters of world orders were tyrants. I believe that America is good and not corrupt and that it wishes a world of "peace and goodwill towards men". What is wrong with that kind of world order. David Rockefeller is not a bad man or conspiracist. He is or was a man of substance who gave of his time, and talent to further the betterment of internationnal society. Tony Blair was just appointed to represent Russia, United States, and United Nations (how about that) as a broker, negotiator, for a peaceful solution to the Israeli/Palestinian thing. He is trying to create a new middle eastern order. Don't get your jollies off thinking that order is some kind of tyranny thing. NEW WORLD ORDER HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FASCISM/SOCIALISM OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. GET A GRIP!
     -- Bruce, 'Bama     
  •  
    Bruce says (and I hardly believe that he is alone), "I believe that America is good and not corrupt and that it wishes a world of 'peace and goodwill towards men'. What is wrong with that kind of world order. David Rockefeller is not a bad man or conspiracist. He is or was a man of substance who gave of his time, and talent to further the betterment of internationnal society." ROFL!! It would take volumes to address the number of delusions to which you subscribe. Next you will tell us that the Federal Reserve is a government department, that the UN promotes world peace, and that ANY order outside that which is authorized by the Constitution is acceptible. Would you even recognize communism if you saw it? In another post you mentioned that you served in the Korean war -- well, what was that about, hmm? Perhaps if we weren't in the UN we might have actually won that war as well as Vietnam instead of reporting our every movement for approval to the UN military chief -- soviet communists! Yes, that's right, the Russians only joined the UN once they were guaranteed to hold the office that commands all UN forces -- forever. Nice. I do understand -- this is all too much to bear for those that have spent a lifetime believing lies told to them by their 'beneficent' government. The more we have invested in the delusion, the harder it is to accept the truth. Follow the money and you will find Rockefeller and his descendants at the helm of totalitarian rule via the hold of the Fed/IMF/World Bank and the shadow government he created known as the Council on Foreign Relations. For such a powerful and far reaching organization, isn't it surprising the press completely ignores them...? Of course, the mainstream media are members of the 'club'. But don't take my word for it -- do your own research if you dare.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
  •  
    Let me get this straight: Your enemies are 1) the communists (ps; they are virtually now non-existent) 2) The Federal Reserve (do you feel the same way towards all central banks) 3) the UN. Fast forward Dude. The Russians are no longer under control of communists you need a new wind mill to charge in order to justify your existence. The UN promotes world peace, between 1913 and 1940 a period of 27 years their were two conflicts called World Wars because they engulfed most of the caucasian inhabited world. From 1945 (the beginning of the UN) to the present a period of 62 years there has not been such a conflagration. You do not have to dig deeper you just need to use your head. Our government has been consistently invited to extend its influence or presence or hegemony further and further east in Europe via NATO. Poland, Hungary, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria (I think) All want to be part of this "western European" alliance which is anchored in the United States of America. These countries certainly do not want this because the United States is some kind of mean, fascist, socailist empire wishing to do them dirt. I assume they want this because they see such a relationship as beneficial to them. In short Archer they want the kind of civilization that we have. Why does the prospect of our civiliztion make some people so happy but yet it makes you so sad. I just don't get it. (We did win the Korean War. Korea was divided at the end of WWII between a north under Soviet influence or hegemony and the south under the US. The north decide that they were going to take it all. The US said no you are not! The US objectives were sustained and the Norths objectives were defeated.) You throw out "dig deeper" all of the time but your shallowness leaves me flabergasted daily.
     -- Bruce, 'Bama     
  • 1
  •  
    Communism is a political ideology -- see the Communist Manifesto -- how many of these planks has the US government instituted? Some completely, others partially -- and totally contrary to the role of government as per the US Constitution. The Federal Reserve/IMF/World Bank are unaccountable private banking monopolies that fund through mere counterfeiting most of the wars in the world today -- they control every dollar in circulation except for those hard currencies still held by a few 'rogue' nations. Membership in the UN requires the bankruptcy of the nation to join. Congress has not declared war since the forming of the UN -- yet our country has been at war (unlawfully and undeclared by Congress) many times since then -- it simply means that the President can wage war without permission from the People. The UN has not stopped any war -- even Canadian troops under UN blue helmets came home dismayed that all they could do is merely watch the atrocities committed in Kosovo and other recent UN 'peace-keeping' missions. The Korean War was a sham -- here is one of many links on the subject of Soviet command of US forces in Korea. To ignore the role of the banking cartel and their control of the world's debt is to merely hack at the branches instead of the root. The UN is a socialist organization with the majority of its members professing socialist government. It is a lie like many others, and its simple goal is to destroy the sovereignty of the United States of America, to merge it into world government, beholden to the World Bank, usurping the Constitution and the power of the People, lay claim to American resources, and ultimately disarm the US citizens in every way possible. Our government has no right or authority to transfer control of America to foreign powers. To do so is treasonous. Follow the money, as always.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 1
  •  
    More boggy man.
     -- warren, olathe     
  •  
    the UN is a martian organization. people from mars have been abducting people one by one from the little towns of the US, and from the major cities. little by little, they've been building up the UN and other major organizations. but everyone knows that they're run by martians. the first time human beings made contact with martians was when the US landed on the moon. Buzz Aldrin was the original ambassador to Mars and that is why he has not only lived this long, but also been endowed with martian strength. thats why he was able to go back to space amidst his age. all of this, the north american union, the diversion of wars in the middle east, immigration, various religions all were created by martians. even "evolution" is just a lie to cover up the martian experiments that have been going on, on this planet! you think we all came from monkeys? hell no. martians have been pulling the strings all along. their original apparatus was the free masons. now its the UN...
     -- ken, chicago     
  • 2
  •  
     -- Anonymous      
    "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. " -- Thomas Jefferson
     -- Dannie Jackson, FOUR OAKS,NC     
  • 1
  •  
    Right on the mark. He would know better than anyone posting here.
     -- Mikey     
  • 1
  •  
     -- Anonymous      
    Whether it is the CFR or other organization, there are unseen forces at work to diminish the sovereignity of the United States. Why? Because "they" want control of the world, and the U.S. is stopping their goal. The desire to control the world goes back to Babylon, the Medes-Persians, Greece, and Rome. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Rear Admiral Chester Ward has experienced the CFR and understands its goals. If he has chosen to warn us, we should listen to "the watchman on the wall." Maranatha.
     -- Ruth, Lakewood     
  • 1
  •  
    WITH THE HELP OF AGENTS OF THE FBI, AND YEARS OF RESEARCH, I HAVE WATCHED AS THOSE WHO SEEK TO BRING ABOUT THE ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT HAVE GOTTEN CLOSE TO ACHIEVING THEIR GOALS OF DESTROYING OUR SOVEREIGNTY. ADM.CHESTER WARD WAS NOT THE ONLY ONE TO WARN US.READ WHAT SEN.BARRY GOLDWATER SAID ABOUT THE CONSPIRACY OF THE CFR, WHICH IS A MODERN TERM FOR THE ILLUMINATI. EVEN GEO. WASHINGTON WAS AWARE OF THEIR PLANS. COME ON FOLKS, GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR BUTTS AND DO SOME RESEARCH. AMERICA NEEDS PATRIOTS WHO ARE INFORMED ABOUT THEIR ENEMIES.
     -- Anonymous, GARDENDALE,AL.     
  • 1
  •  
    There was a bumper sticker once that said something like, "The naive don't have a clue (to their vulnerability, or state of mind). Jesus said if we have eyes to see and ears to hear, then we will believe [the truth]. If not, we become prey for the roaring lion and will be deceived and consumed. It's up to us. If we love the truth, God will make sure we find it, whatever the subject.
     -- Roger, Des Moines     
  • 1
  •  
    i agree with roger from des moines. wisdom givin by GOD is what should be everyones highest priority.
     -- tin can snipe, maine     
  •  
    Just woke up myself; despite it shaking me to my core and being painful to realize, I'm glad I did. My red-pill was an elderly veteran asking a simple question, "Ever hear of General Smedley Butler? Betcha did learn about him in school." I'm grateful that those as selflessly-patriotic as our founders heeded us warnings. I'm currently reading 'Why is Your Country at War ...' by former congressman Charles August Lindbergh Sr. (January 20, 1859 – May 24, 1924).
     -- Spunkalunk, Fort Lauderdale, FL     
  • 1
  •  
    Some people can't handle the truth or won't participate in it, I'm glad many R joining tea parties and R getting exposed to the truth. Thank god and patriotism for Adm. Ward he's a hero for coming out with this instead of just quietly going away, as i fear many do. I have studied these subjects for many years using the congressional record as well as many books by almost countless authors. David Rockefeller himself admitted to the conspiracy and says he is proud of it. Why he hasn't been prosecuted is the question we should ask, or maybe we don't prosecute traitors if they hold the note to the farm.
     -- J scott powelson, costa mesa, Ca.     
  • 1
  •  
    I have absolutely no doubt that Admiral Ward tells the truth Eisenhour also warned us. John Kennedy warned us & I believe it cost him his life. I believe if Ron Paul is elected he will be killed. I believe the are absolutely ruthless in their quest for their New World Order and not benevolent as Bruce would have us believe.
     -- Johnsmith, Harrison     
  • 1
  •  
    "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. " -- Thomas Jefferson
     -- A, NYC     
  • 1
  •  
    When uneducated naive men rely on man to lead them their demise is soon at hand! There will be a WWIII, and guess which two nations will be fighting. When you hear we are in a Global economy think of what that means in the scheme of the NWO! When people start to quote Nixon as a leader to admire this shows where some of theses fools heads are located. When we wake we will have no [lace in U.S.
     -- A, NYC     
  • 1
  •  
    We are slowly becoming a communist state losing our freedom one at a time in the name of Terrorist act laws to protect the people. Go read the many quotes by Thomas Jefferson about your freedom as he saw this happening many years before our time!
     -- A, NYC     
  • 1
  •  
    The CFR is but one of many organizations that are busy reducing the populace of the world to the status of "inventory". But they have only one real tool...the International Banking System. Abolish the Federal Reserve and you take away any power they have. Take away their control the money, and they might as well be a Boy Scout Troop.
     -- J Carlton, Calgary     
  • 1
  •  
    Shows how Ignorant people are . If you search CFR / Richard Hass he actually ADMITS in his own words what Admiral WARD exposed " COUNTRIES WILL HAVE TO CEDE SOVEREIGNTY , to get economic aid for catastrophes , terrorism , famine " ..etc etc . CFR SAID IT so what part of that do you idiots don't understand ?
     -- Kahoneez, new york     
  • 1
  •  
    David Rockefeller's book 'Memoirs' admits secretly conspiring for a NWO

    In David Rockefeller's book 'Memoirs' he admits he is part of a secret cabal working to destroy the United States and create a new world order.Here is the direct quote from his book, pg 405:

    "For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - One World, if you will.If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it |
    I have actually gone to the library and confirmed that the words above are in his book, at that page number. David Rockefeller has been a member of the CFR for most of his life, so how can you get a better connection of the true designs of that organization?
     -- Leo, Balaton     
  • 1
  •  
     
    Rate this quote!
    How many stars?
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

     
    What do YOU think?
    Your name:
    Your town:
        CLICK JUST ONCE!

    More Quotations
    Get a Quote-A-Day! Free!
    Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box.
    RSS Subscribe
    Quotes & Quotations - Send This Quote to a Friend

    © 1998-2017 Liberty-Tree.ca