Benjamin Franklin Quote

Sillik, maybe I can help you get over your Marxist wolf pack propaganda and fallacious dogma. The “Consumer” / “Producer” relationship is but a small segment of history. As a socialist, it is the norm / clear that you make up definitions to words to fit your theocratic dogma - BUT ! ! ! - a “consumer” is a buyer or vendee that acquires goods or services for direct use or ownership rather than, for resale or use in production and manufacturing. The consumer (individual - sentient, legal, some times enjoyably agreeable / some times antagonistic, etc.) typically purchases products at an accepted price (sometimes inexpensive, some times reasonable, some times at great cost {like, by socialism’s induced inflation}, some times by necessity, sometimes by desire, etc.). Sillik, by definition (in all languages, - civil / legal, etc.) the “consumer” does NOT sell products (being productive or destructive to a social setting is not part of any definition or fit whatsoever within a realm of association concerning your word salad).

A “producer’s” creative vision may or may not fall within a “consumer’s” desire or need. I once produced a product for consumer’s use that was the highest quality, most versatile, etc. in a specific industry. Some consumers would pay the extra cost for the best because it fit within their circumstances, desires or needs. Your word salad’s erroneous attempt to redefine and corral an entire relationship was a lie from inception.