|
"It is the censor's business to make a judgment about the propriety of the content or message of the proposed expressive activity. The regulation here does not authorize any judgment about the content of any speeches. ... A park is a limited space, and to allow unregulated access to all comers could easily reduce rather than enlarge the park's utility as a forum for speech. Just imagine two rallies held at the same time in the same park area using public-address systems that drowned out each other's speakers."
|
by:
|
|
|
Source:
|
Thomas v. Chicago Park District, Sep. 2000
|
Rating: | |
Categories: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
