"As socialists, we are opponents of the Jews, because we see, in the Hebrews, the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods."
by:
Joseph Paul Goebbels
(1897-1945) German politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany
Source:
Goebbels, Joseph; Mjölnir (1932). Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken. Munich: Franz Eher Nachfolger. English translation: Those Damned Nazis
Rating:
Categories:
 
Bookmark and Share  
Reader comments about this quote:
 -- joseph, berlin      
Funny, Jews like Communism too. Many were like Karl Marx.
 -- cal, lewisville, tx     
  • 2
    		•  
    Socialist don't like any productive individuals.
     -- Mike, Norwalk     
  • 2
    		•  
    How many times in here have we been told by some one that the Nazi party were right wingers and not socialist? Very good quote.
     -- warren, olathe     
  • 1
    		•  
    Zealous of the mosaic law, sets the groundwork for socialism's forced "welfare box", keen to capitalism through gift, talent and usury, being self-willed, denies their brothers Liberty granted by the mosaic law. Therefore through this disobedience, being cast down, they become jealous of that which is lifted up through liberty. " I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles for to provoke them to jealousy." Romans 11:11. The greatest change to take place in 2000 years. 11 is the number of change. 
     -- Ronw13, Oregon     
    		•  
    We are a social arrangement that needs to be brought to fair trial hearings.  The "winners" of history need to be summoned to court.  The truth must be found and be our guide.  The true human is innocent by reason of sanity.
     -- Fredrick W Sillik, Los Angeles     
  • 2
    		•  
    Socialists are the only productive individuals. All others produce your grave digger as Mr. Marx quite correctly alluded.
     -- Fredrick W Sillik, Anytown, USA     
  • 2
    		•  
    Socialists don't use violent tactics. They are social creatures that all true humans display.  Mr. Marx was quite incorrect in the concept of "violent revolution."   Revolutions are never violent. 
     -- Fredrick W Sillik, Anytown, USA     
  • 2
    		•  
    Socialist want a unified world.  A world with no national boundaries is required.  Wars are typically cordoned off by national borders. The creation of a one world state world would make wars based on national antipathies not feasible. Wars are in reality against our own personal characters.  Taking war away from this confine has been the route used by this immature species to deal with its own lack of personal responsibility.  Peace begins at home and with our personal souls for this mature "promising" species.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    The Socialist does not treat others as enemies, but treats them as sick clients gone astray from the human path.  Socialism is pure science and artistry.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    Socialists are more recognizable by their questions than their answers. For instance, where is the nuclear arsenal of the former Soviet Union. Like to pay thousand yen to find out.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    Socialists are more recognizable by their questions than their answers. For instance, where are the nuclear weapons of the former Soviet Union?  Also, would the Japanese be knowledgeable about this issue? I don't have a thousand yen. I just have a planet full of incompetent elected officials.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    The present situation stacks up this way:  You have a Russian President who makes Bill Gates look like a panhandler on 5th and Broadway, not in New York, but in Council Bluffs, Iowa.  You have have the most deadly mechanical process in history, missing. Finally, you have some vengeful Japanese who were down on all fours, bombed into submission. Mr. Biden we need to talk.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    According to historical accounts the Nazi's launched violent forces against others. This would not make them eligible for the Socialist title.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    The Union of Soviet Socialist Republic was not eligible, nor is North Korean, Vietnam and certainly not China for Socialist title
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    The historical, legal and most accepted definition of socialism is: “any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership of property, religion and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.” There is no altering or other mention of administrative mechanisms or affinity to peace or violence in socialism's definition. Your personal definition of socialism doesn’t quite work in the real world - you may want to expand your enclave’s view and find a new term that better fits your desired statist theocracy.
     -- Mike, Norwalk     
  • 1
    		•  
    Mike of Norwalk, An individual can, I believe  be anything he desires. You have described the mechanical components of an idea humankind has dreamed of, since the dawn of our species. Why this hasn't come to fruition is because its not a machine.  The process is like a living orgasm.  It begins with not organizing your institutions, because you can't unless there a vision. What you're talking about is more akin to machine, not life.  Socialism begins with Socialist, not the arrangement of government.  See, Mike all these places, Cuba, USSR, etc have the mechanics in place, but no one wanted to be Socialist. You in the United States acquired the first Socialist, because he realized its a living process that begins with a seed.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    Fredrick, I agree — an individual can be, or develop into any natural law desire he/she so chooses. "Socialism" though, is a well recognized finite organized mechanism (as I stated above). The rest of your word salad is a mental exercise that makes no sense, lacks correlation and is not historically accurate. If socialism begins with "socialist"; what is socialist and/or socialism? By definition, socialism is an arrangement of government. If you are speaking of some kind of anarco—communal relationship, you need to be more descriptive and come up with new nomenclature to describe your vision, dream or living orgasm.
     -- Mike, Norwalk     
  • 1
    		•  
    The goal now is too make you creatures realize is that you are not drug dispensaries and sex machines, but developing living organism. You know, Mike, these conventional creatures think there is some positive characteristic to recreational drugs and sex.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    Fredrick, I like the concept !


     -- Mike, Norwalk     
    		•  
    Excellent!
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    Mike of Norwalk: trying to converse on this internet I detected a problem. Since these comments began with a quote by Joseph Goebbels it my hope that I'm not giving him the excellent verdict. I tried to present my take on Socialism to you and I hoped that I gave you Mike of Norwalk, a tenable account of socialism and you me a gave positive note to my effort and not telling me like Josepg Goebbels "concept."
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    The true Socialist response to the Jewish practitioner is to treat them as all religious followers.  We Socialists do not have opponents from our perspective.  Religion is a psychotic force instilled by the societal arrangement and must be treated as the illness it is.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  

    Further in response to Goebbels the Socially responsible do not gear up for war in solving the world's problems. They put their best intentions forward and take on the world's problems with the dream of building. We try solving and correcting as many mistakes as we can.


     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    Even further, true Socialist believe war and killing are a definite misuse of a nations goods or any other goods for that matter.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    There are many misconceptions about socialism. For instance Robert Redford in the movie The Way We Were. His Hubble character explains the "Fascist" and the Communist will mutually benefit each other, and then make passes at each other's wives.  The Fascist will take your wife.  There's a distinct difference, however, the social being will never consider taking another's wife. The social being  would actually give you advice for a successful marriage relationship. 
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    The true social man would much rather give advice on the issue of the characteristics of a good marriage than involve himself with the most alluring of married females if the opportunity presented itself.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    The true social man cannot recognize marriages of the same gender. True romance is not possible under this condition.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    The social man  correctly believes homosexuals to be sexist.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    For the Socialist mental health is the biggest issue.  Convention medical individuals are all mentality ill themselves and are not qualified to treat anyone. Mental health can be recovered.  There are no drugs or surgeries available, but a person can be given positive, and only positive advice and counseling. 
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    An examined life is a valuable life.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    Mental health can not be issued though violent, secret, biased, partial administrators, but though open and honest individuals ready to involve the whole world in the discoveries of Mental Health.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    The Socialist is an evolutionist and knows that his son and daughter will always be better than himself. You cannot reject mother nature's imperative.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    Not funny at all. Communism and Fascism are two peas in the same pod. Hitler said so himself in "Hitler's Table Talk," speaking to Albert Speer.

     -- Tom, Dallas     
  • 1
    		•  
    Right and Left are merely different ends of the socialist scale. Conservatives are not 'right-wing', they are above the socialist scale entirely.  They are the true Liberals in the classic liberalism sense, like the Founding Fathers — probably called Libertarians today.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
    		•  
    Good Lord, Fred THE socialist, I can't think of a more "bizarro" interpretation of socialism in my life!  History literally demonstrates the exact opposite of everything you have said.

    Hundreds of millions of citizens have been murdered by their own governments in the name of socialism in its several forms.  It is by far the most violent political philosophy ever proffered — "by any means necessary" is its creed.  It is a religion in and of itself always claiming the moral high ground while it tramples upon the natural born rights of everyone. 

    Such ignorance is uncanny.  Such hypocrisy has no equal.  Such narcissism is way too common...

    'Methinks thou protesteth too much."
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
    		•  
    No, Mr Archer, you've been hustled. Socialism is the identifying quality of the human race being correctly identified, the social animal. I protest nothing. I provide correct explanations.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    The only hustling that is going on here is yours, Fred, and nobody is buying it.  Heck, you can't even package it well enough to be sold.  Just a bunch of pseudointellectual generalizations, full of logical fallacies, void of substance, with a few stumblings upon fact only to be misinterpreted by your psychobabble. 

    Seriously, take a breather before you have a stroke or burst into spontaneous combustion.  
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mr Archer,  actually I feel quite inspired and motivated by your assertions, because if my points were really even partly the misalignment  of what you say they are, you wouldn't even bother to even address or respond.  No Mr Archer, I'm the only sane salesman in town, and it's get your mental alignment here.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    I reply because you spam this list with so much pabulum.  Your narcissism in beyond compare.  Nobody here is buying your nonsense — nobody.  Why are you here? 

    These are "Liberty" quotes, and you can be counted on responding negatively to each one every day, sometimes multiple times.  Your message is anti-liberty consistently.  It is full of hubris.  Your utopian ideas are not new, and are in fact, little different than what Hitler says in Mein Kamf. 

    Yes, you are a socialist, no different than the other socialists that are responsible for the murder of 100's of millions throughout history.  Thank God you have no power, though it is not surprising because you can't communicate clearly.  I reply out of compassion for you, because you are indeed lost in the woods.  I'm sure you have loved ones praying for your sanity.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mr Archer, my stand is for change. Hitler is much more similar to you and every other male I meet. Mr Archer, you are being very  dishonorable by saying what I say is in Mr Hitler's literature. He was a very popular fellow. He was elected to the chancellorship of Germany. Every female in Germany wanted him. I couldn't get a vote for election from my mother when she was alive. There are no females interested in me on the entire planet. How could you possibly compare me with him. Mr Archer you are truly being dishonorable and misrepresenting by you accusations, and there is no God to pray to.  No nonexistent creature called God can give you sanity, you must earn it.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    Additionally, Mr Archer, I am a Socialist, and you are trying to misrepresent me as a murderer.  Some accusation of guilt by association. That's very low.  I have no intent to murder, rape, and rob, therefore I have not done these crimes. I have represented the human as the social animal it is, and only guilty of that. I am innocent by reason of sanity.  Being human and being a Socialist have both always been misrepresented and with recovery of my humanity stand to correct the definition of both of these misrepresentations. The human is innocent and so is the social human, the Socialist.

     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mr Archer, you and your guilt by association strategy is no more credible than the concept of good, in saying I say that I try to be a good fellow.  You say you're good, Mr Hitler said he was good, everyone one else without exception says they're good, and I say I try to be good. Maybe the correct strategy for me is say I try to be a Socialist.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    It indeed grieves my heart to hear of your loneliness, Fred, which doesn't surprise me and may be why you hang out here endlessly debating Mike and me.  May I suggest that it is your words and actions that repel women and family, and I invite you to let go of such stubborn ranting and try walking in another's shoes for a bit.

    Speaking of misrepresenting people, you may recall that you often refer to the Founding Fathers as "sickos", have called me a "drug dealer and sex trafficker," everyone but you "mentally ill" while referring to yourself as "lucid and rational" and "I am, without a rational person's doubt, the sole representative of the healthy mentality individual on this planet."  And that is only in the last few days — you've been ranting on this site for several years now.  The Editor must be a saint!

    I humbly prescribe for you some hefty doses of humility, gratitude, peace, and a willingness to empty your cup and start anew.  I think nothing but a rebirth into innocence can clear away such an ingrained mindset.  Throw off that abysmal yoke and taste freedom! 



     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mr. Archer, interestingly I feel there absolutely nothing more humble than a demonstration of the truth, which I believe I espouse on an excellent consistent frequency.  You, the editor, Mike, and everyone else I meet, don't seem to realize that I am the only one on the entire planet they have a disagreement with, don't you feel that a bit strange.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mr Archer you and your sneaky ways and sneaky buddies are trying end my participation on this internet sight. You think it fitting to end my involvement with where it started with this quote some four years ago.  That's your only intent Mr Archer. Sadly, I am the only one with empathetic and sympathetic facilities.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 1
    		•  
    Sillik, your god syndrome speak is WRONG again (continually). For one, I disagree with more than I agree with — as a matter of rule. There are those that I agree with most of the time but, they are the exception. Your consistent frequency is extremely skewed. Your oscillating vibrations are ANTI — rhythmic and contrary to individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. According to your writings, you wouldn't know truth or a demonstration thereof if it bit you in the back side 🤪.
     -- Mike,, Norwalk     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mike,, Norwalk, specific example on a point you disagree with anyone, please. Please be specific.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    I vehemently disagree with most of what Marx wrote! I disagree with an old participant on this sight (Dick) when he said there is no god!  I disagree with Trump and his off topic / misdirection arguments when he says the 14th Amendment doesn't say what it says (backed by SCOTUS)! Law maker / enforcement is/are an oxymoron(s) in a domain of the law of nature and of nature's God — I disagree with policing agents that enforce "legal positivism's" / anti-law compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, non-recognition of perfected allodium, etc.) as well as all other man's cruelty / enslaving to/of man.
     -- Mike,, Norwalk     
  • 2
    		•  
    Fred, I'm sorry you feel that way.  My disagreement with you is primarily one of ideology — your praise of socialism and my praise of liberty.  Since this is a Liberty Quotes site, the comments have predominantly been pro-liberty, unlike yours which make no apologies for socialism and its ills other than to say you are the one and only true socialist, full of empathy and sympathy.  Your projections upon me are hardly empathetic.  I have tried to engage with you respectfully, no matter how deranged you may come across.  I wish you well — in fact, please do seek help from a qualified therapist, even a liberal one, who may be able to help you with your delusions of grandeur and narcissism.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 2
    		•  
    Fred, I disagree with your claim to be THE one and only socialist.  Who then are the hundreds of millions of those that claim to be socialists?  There must be hundreds if not thousands of socialist parties in the world today — and none of them are real socialists? 

    Your definition of socialism is a hodge-podge of traditional socialist ideologies intermixed with Christian ideals minus the acknowledgement of God and the immutable rights that are in born and never subject to a vote.  From where will your socialist 'laws' come?  Is there any limit or check upon them?  If you are the only true socialist, are you then the de facto leader of true socialism?  Are you the Führer or Premier or Czar?  Where do the rest of us fit into your utopia?  Do we have any choices? 

    Sorry, but what you rant on day in and day out is just not understandable.  But maybe it's just because you are so brilliant — like a Nero or others that claim to be above everyone else, the only sane voice in a world of 'mentally ill' useless eaters.  Sounds pretty socialist to me ...
     -- E Archer, NYC     
    		•  
    Well, Mr Archer I am the practicing Socialist.  Hell, no I'm not a Fuhrer or Czar, these are child prodigies who complicated the world like all you child prodigies. No, I am an uncomplicator and you can't understand that. I am just the average everyday ordinary adult. The last thing you would understand or guess. You do not believe in the fundamental practice of earning, but the Socialist believes we can change this attitude. You are not human, "could you claim to even be alive," Mr Businessman, "what's your plan, wheel and deal with the best them, steal it from the rest of them,". We can change you into adults. That's Socialism from the authentic Socialist. Love, friendship, sincerity, humanity from here on.

     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    If you are the only true socialist, who is "we' when you say "we can change you into adults"?  Who do you have with you?  From your own admission, women want nothing to do with you, so there goes 50% of the world's population.  You couldn't convince your family — sounds like you judged them pretty harshly from a very conceited point of view.  You clam to be practicing love and friendship, but call everyone a mentally ill child — I doubt you can count your friends on one hand.

    I am not human?  I'm Mr. Businessman? ;-) Hilarious!  Is that what you have concluded after 4 years of my comments on Liberty, gratitude, a republican form of government, mutual respect of each others' inborn rights, taking responsibility for oneself, live and let live, acknowledging one's wholeness and the value of a spiritual path to "know thyself"? 

    You don't know me.  I doubt you can ever know anyone with that kind of attitude.  Everyone in this world needs to love and be loved, and in that regard you sure sound like you have a long way to go.  And that is heart-breaking.
     -- E Archer, NYC     
  • 1
    		•  
    You got me on this one Mr Archer, I'm going to change you into adults.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    My belief is Mr Archer we both can count all of our friends on one of our respective individual one single solitary fingers. Business persons don't get personally involved with anyone, including themselves, "nothing personal, business is just business."


     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    The numbers you put up are exaggerated. Those who made remote association with the Socialist idea were just expressing what the big money players of the respective nations told them to say. No one in Russia, Chinese, Vietnam, Cuban has the slightest idea of the ideology. These respective citizenry are more critical, if you get any response at all, of Socialism than you are.

     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
  • 2
    		•  
    Mike,, Norwalk, Well, you convinced me you don't agree with everyone. You put me in my place. I'll be very embarrassed for the next five minutes and than I have to move on. Times a-wasting. I got a planet to save.
     -- Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown     
    		•  
    No, sir, I am neither 'Mr. Businessman' nor friendless.  I am blessed with many, many friends and family that I love and love me.  We vary in interests, politics, occupations, and live all over.  But we are family even if not related.  Because we don't all agree, we respect each other.  And because we have not authority to force our will upon each other, we let each other do as they see fit while respecting others do the same.  We're all different ages, have different levels of wealth and property.  But happy are we when we are together, sharing our stories, our recipes, our discoveries.  We might even disagree from time time, but we would never let that get in the way of our bonds.  Is this socialism?
     -- E Archer, NYC     
    		•  
     
    Rate this quote!
    How many stars?
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
     
    What do YOU think?
    Your name:
    		 Your town:
        CLICK JUST ONCE!

    Today's Quotes
    More Quotations
    Most Popular
    Recent Comments
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • E Archer, NYC
    • E Archer, NYC
    • Barry, Petaluma
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • E Archer, NYC
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Mike,, Norwalk
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    • Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown
    Get a Quote-A-Day! Free!
    Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box.
    RSS Subscribe
    Quotes & Quotations - Send This Quote to a Friend

    © 1998-2025 Liberty-Tree.ca